You've probably seen press reports on Aabar's 2009 performance.
- Comprehensive income of AED2.075 billion versus AED727 million in 2008. Roughly 2.9x.
- Shareholders' equity up 5.5x to AED12.7 billion versus AED 2.3 billion at FYE 2008.
- Total assets up 11.7x to AED37.3 billion from AED3.2 billion at FYE 2008.
Let's look a bit closer at Aabar's 2009 performance. Not a full credit or investment analysis but just some points that caught my eye.
And what better place to look than its 2009 audited financial statements.
Income
- The company's 2009 income was largely driven by non cash changes in fair value in one investment, Daimler. That resulted (Note 8) in some AED 9.1 billion of income. Interestingly as disclosed in Note 9 Aabar incurred an expense of AED6.8 billion from derivatives on the Daimler shares - put options and a collar. Note 22 (i) describes the collar range. I'm guessing that the hedge is in place at the request of the lenders of Term Loan 1 and 2 who financed some AED10.7 billion equivalent for the purchase price.
- What's a collar? Here's a simple definition. In short a technique to reduce the cost of buying downside protection (buying a put) by giving away some of the upside (by selling a call).
- Aabar acquired its 9.1% stake in Daimler in March 2009. A glance at a stock price chart for 2009 will show that this was the absolute ideal time. During that period Daimler's shares were at their lowest - in fact at their lowest in the past five years. Aabar got the shares at Euro 20.27. At YE the shares were Euro 52.95 and are trading currently at about Euro 36.00. And I suppose in this context one might be tempted to remark that at least it didn't buy Chrysler or GM.
- In essence then from an income statement perspective, Aabar is currently a "one trick" pony. As Note 38 states a 10% change in European equity prices results in a change of AED2.04 billion in its income statement.
- For 2008, the company's income was driven by one event, the sale of Pearl Energy Limited.
- Of course balancing this fact is that the company adopted a completely different strategy in 2009 so one would not expect it to have fully achieved its goals in one year. But this is definitely a point for lenders and investors to keep their eyes firmly on.
Equity Increase AED10.4 Billion
- AED6.7 billion was from the conversion of a mandatory convertible bond issued to IPIC (Aabar's 71.23% shareholder and an Abu Dhabi Government company).
- AED1.6 billion from a shareholder loan - also from IPIC.
- AED2.1 billion from income and related events.
Debt
- Borrowings increased from AED893 million to AED 15.1 billion or AED14.2 billion. And since we're keeping score that's 16.9x the level in 2008.
- What's even more important to note is that on a net debt basis Aabar went from a negative debt (it actually had cash in excess of its debt at FYE 2008) to a debtor position. Now having debt is not in itself bad. One would expect an investment company to use leverage. But leverage is something to watch if one is an investor or creditor. Especially where investment values are volatile. Or where they may prove to be illiquid.
- On that latter point, of the company's six borrowings, five were secured by its investments (Note 22). Some brave lenders extended a US1.6 billion short term loan facility repayable in 2010. At a lower rate than that on the company's secured debt! ? Against which Aabar had drawn USD0.6 billion. As a general rule, it's not the wisest of ideas to be an unsecured lender when the borrower's most liquid assets are pledged to other creditors, including the asset that generated the company's income. The unsecured creditor is the one who gets "squeezed" first and hardest if there is a problem.
Other Assets - Advances on Properties
- Aabar has roughly AED7.8 billion in Advances on Investment Properties. That's roughly 24% of assets. There's no descriptive footnote to explain what these assets are and where they are. I also note that the company depreciates buildings over 67 years (Note 3, page 20) on a straight line basis.
- There are some "banking assets" in the consolidated financials related to Falcon. But creditors and depositors at Falcon have first claim on these. Probably to the tune of approximately AED4 billion (Due to Banks and Customer Deposits).
Cashflow
- You knew I'd get here eventually.
- On a cash operating basis Aabar was negative for both cashflow from operations and cashflow after working capital changes. Considering the latter (AED1.1 billion)
- Investing Activities and Financing Activities were in a roughly balance at (AED21.4 billion) and AED22.2 billion.
- Leading to an overall decline in cash of very roughly AED300 million.
Other
- The company has advised that its Board is recommending to the shareholders that they authorize the issuance of AED7.3 billion in convertible bonds with a AED2.5 per share conversion price (roughly the current trading price). The bonds would be issued to IPIC. If the bonds are converted in full, IPIC will own 85%.
- Since the bonds are not mandatorily convertible, they do not appear to be legally subordinate to other creditors. Maybe some attorney out there who practices in the UAE can say if equitable subordination is a UAE-law concept. (Editor's Note: The mere fact this question is posed here is perhaps a fairly clear sign of a bit of manifest delusion by the writer about the readership of this blog).
- Ability to diversify income. Right now as described above the company is a one trick pony. Not something that realistically can be changed overnight. But something that should be worked on.
- Diversification in investments. Beyond single name concentration (Daimler), the company is heavily skewed to the auto industry and has made some additional investments in this space - though it has also diversified since then with an investment in Virgin "Space"!
- What the additional AED7.3 billion in convertible bonds are used for. Replacement of debt? Additional investments?
- What is the investment philosophy of Aabar? What sort of portfolio is it building? Does the portfolio exhibit a common theme? Or competence resident at the company (Aabar) level? Is Aabar merely a financial investor? Or somehow will it be involved in developing value? Or is it just buying "stuff" that looks good at the time? And which might later be discovered to be "non core" assets? There doesn't appear to be a clear statement on investment strategy on Aabar's website. The last analyst presentation posted on the site dates from 2007.
- How do Aabar's investments fit in with IPIC's mandate? As per its website, "The International Petroleum Investment Company, IPIC, was formed by the Abu Dhabi government in 1984, tasked with an ambitious mandate to invest in hydrocarbons industries across the globe." And how might that affect its contribution of future cash to Aabar in the future?
- Use of secured debt. Are the key cash generating liquid assets pledged to creditors? What does that mean for investors and unsecured creditors?
- Cashflow, cashflow cashflow. The life blood of companies. "Man" does not live by capital appreciation alone.
2 comments:
Outstanding Analysis ! Would love to read your take on the planned delisting/ potential for a buyout of the minority shareholders and if you see value at the current price (AED 1.5) due to the current uncertainty?
Anonymous
Thanks for the kind words.
As to the planned delisting, I think it makes eminent sense for the major shareholder as it will relieve him of (a) certain reporting requirements, and (b) the necessity of considering (at least as a matter of regulation and law) the interests of minority shareholders before taking action. Delisting will eliminate the potentially "disturbing" valuation impact of market price data.
As to the fair value of the shares, that would require a lot of work that I'm not prepared to do on the company itself.
Perhaps more "tricky" would be calculating the appropriate haircuts for certain factors.
I'm from the school of increased caution when
(1) Free float is low. The liquidity (exit) and valuation implications are not positive.
(2) The major shareholder is a government or parastatal. Decisions are sometimes not driven by economic considerations.
(3) The Government is largely a personal rather than a true institutional enterprise. Decisions may be driven not only by "careful" consideration but "whim" and "ego".
(4) The market itself is dominated by retail investors and thus subject to wider "mood swings".
(5) Transparency, corporate governance, regulatory regimes and legal protections for investors are deficient.
(6) Business practices and ethics are "unfamiliar".
Now as you look over those 6 factors, you'll notice that they are present to some degree in so-called developed markets. The difference is not a matter of kind but one of degree with more egregious violations generally less tolerated and prevalent.
Post a Comment