Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 August 2018

Американский Е́льцин (America’s Yeltsin)

слава россии!
слава США! 

слава олигархам!


Скорее всего, в США сделают то, что сделал Борис в России.

Monday, 31 October 2016

Responding to a Direct Challenge AA Corrects The President of the Russian Federation

The Incredibly "Scary" Vladimir Putin (TISVP)
On 27 October Bloomberg reported that the President of the Russian Federation had dismissed charges of attempting to influence the US Presidential election in remarks at the Valdai International Discussion Club. 

One particular quote attributed to TISVP caught AA's sharp eye.

Is America some kind of banana republic? America is a great power. If I’m wrong, correct me.
If you've been following the news of late, you of course know that Mr. Putin is one incredibly scary individual with seemingly unbounded powers and a will of steel.   Not a man to be trifled with or provoked.  The media is in total agreement on this.

Yet, on the other hand, according to Bloomberg, he did ask to be corrected if he was wrong.

AA thought long and hard on this issue and decided to take Mr. Putin at his word. What better day to reply to TISVP than Halloween?

Here is AA's considered response  to the banana republic question.

While you are correct that the USA is a great power and that banana republics have typically been small rather weak countries (economically and militarily), I'd like you to consider that a good argument can be made that a key, perhaps the key, distinguishing characteristic of a banana republic is the nature and quality of its politics and politicians.

Singapore is a small country, yet no one would call it a banana republic (BR). 

AA can think of a couple nuclear armed states (outside the G-8) whose politics definitely qualify them for BR status. 

And would offer this recent blogpost for your consideration. 

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Third US Presidential Debate: A Lonely Nation Turns Its Eyes to You

Where Have You Gone?
Given the state of US politics, Disneyland might have been more appropriate, though there is precedent for Las Vegas where the "house" and not the customer generally wins "anyway you look at it." 

Tip of AA's enormous tarbush to his departed father who shared this and other of his music with me.

Sunday, 11 July 2010

GCC Oil Fims Accused in Kickback Scheme


You may have seen articles like this one recently.

I don't know about you, but AA is doubly shocked.
  
Shocked at allegations of corruption, though at least I suppose I can rest easy knowing that there is nothing untoward going on with oil exports from the GCC states.  No special deals, no personal discounts or the like.

In one sense this is old news, the US Department of Justice issued a press release last year July on the case in which CCI entered into a plea bargain with the DOJ.   The allegation is for fairly widespread activity: 200 payments in 30 countries from around the globe not just the GCC.

I'd of course hasten to add that while CCI has admitted wrongdoing as far as I know no representative from any of the name countries has admitted guilt.  Nor have any such parties be judicially determined to have taken a bribe.  

As the DOJ notes in its press release (link above): 

"An indictment is merely an accusation and the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty at trial beyond a reasonable doubt."
The recent resurfacing of this story has to do with the extradition to the United States of a foreign national former employee of CCI who is accused of participating in the scheme.

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

Idiocy Knows No Borders: When You Worship Guns, It's Just Natural

Representative Henry Burns
If you need an armed guard to protect you from fellow worshippers in your mosque, synagogue or church,  that may be a sign that it's time to find another house of worship.  

As part of the debate on this bill, which has been approved (this is America after all), one Representative raised an interesting point.
Rep. Charmaine Marchand Stiaes, D-New Orleans, said that when armed congregants shoot at an attacker, "nine out of 10 times they will hit a constituent of the  church and not the person they were looking for."
I guess down there in Waziristan, excuse me,  Louisiana there are enough shootings in churches to come up with these statistics. 9 out of 10.  Not 7 out of 10.   The answer is clearly  mandatory marksmenship lessons as part of Sunday school.

And perhaps the most telling quote of all .....

Under federal law, people who pose a heightened risk of violence cannot buy or own firearms, including convicted felons, domestic abusers, the seriously mentally ill and several other categories. Suspected terrorist is not one them.

Individuals on the government’s terrorist watch list can be barred from boarding airplanes, but not from purchasing high-powered guns or explosives.
Several attempts have been made to pass a bill to correct this error.  If you know the USA, you know that we love our guns.  The bill has repeatedly failed.

The National Rifle Association has come out more than once four square on the terrorists' constitutional right to "bear arms" and explosives as well.    It is they believe the original intent of the Founders.

Sunday, 4 April 2010

Aabar Investments - Behind the 2009 Earnings Press Release


You've probably seen press reports on Aabar's 2009 performance.
  1. Comprehensive income of AED2.075 billion versus AED727 million in 2008.  Roughly 2.9x.
  2. Shareholders' equity up 5.5x to AED12.7 billion versus AED 2.3 billion at FYE 2008.
  3. Total assets up 11.7x to AED37.3 billion from AED3.2 billion at FYE 2008.
Let's look a bit closer at Aabar's 2009 performance.   Not a full credit or investment analysis but just some points that caught my eye.

And what better place to look than its 2009 audited financial statements.

Income
  1. The company's 2009 income was largely driven by non cash changes in fair value in one investment, Daimler.  That resulted (Note 8) in some AED 9.1 billion of income.  Interestingly as disclosed in Note 9 Aabar incurred an expense of AED6.8 billion from derivatives on the Daimler shares - put options and a collar.  Note 22 (i) describes the collar range.    I'm guessing that  the hedge is in place at the request of the lenders of Term Loan 1 and 2 who financed some AED10.7 billion equivalent for the purchase price.  
  2. What's a collar?   Here's a simple definition.  In short a technique to reduce the cost of buying downside protection (buying a put)  by giving away some of the upside (by selling a call).
  3. Aabar acquired its 9.1% stake in Daimler in March 2009.  A glance at a stock price chart for 2009 will show that this was the absolute ideal time.  During that period Daimler's shares were at their lowest - in fact at their lowest in the past five years.  Aabar got the shares at Euro 20.27.  At YE the shares were Euro 52.95 and are trading currently at about Euro 36.00. And I suppose in this context one might be tempted to remark that at least it didn't buy Chrysler or GM.
  4. In essence then from an income statement perspective, Aabar is currently a "one trick" pony.   As Note 38 states a 10% change in European equity prices results in a change of AED2.04 billion in its income statement.
  5. For 2008, the company's income was driven by one event, the sale of Pearl Energy Limited.
  6. Of course balancing this fact is that the company adopted a completely different strategy in 2009 so one would not expect it to have fully achieved  its goals in one year. But this is definitely a point for lenders and investors to keep their eyes firmly on.
Equity Increase AED10.4 Billion
  1. AED6.7 billion was from the conversion of a mandatory convertible bond issued to IPIC (Aabar's 71.23% shareholder and an Abu Dhabi Government company).  
  2. AED1.6 billion from a shareholder loan - also from IPIC.
  3. AED2.1 billion from income and related events.
Debt
  1. Borrowings increased from AED893 million to AED 15.1 billion or AED14.2 billion.  And since we're keeping score that's 16.9x the level in 2008.
  2. What's even more important to note is that on a net debt basis Aabar went from a negative debt (it actually had cash in excess of its debt at FYE 2008) to a debtor position.  Now having debt is not in itself bad.  One would expect an investment company to use leverage.  But leverage is something to watch if one is an investor or creditor.  Especially where investment values are volatile.  Or where they may prove to be illiquid.
  3. On that latter point, of the company's six borrowings, five were secured by its investments (Note 22).  Some brave lenders extended a US1.6 billion short term loan facility repayable in 2010.   At a lower rate  than that on the company's secured debt!  ?  Against which Aabar had drawn USD0.6 billion.  As a general rule, it's not the wisest of ideas to be an unsecured lender when the borrower's most liquid assets are pledged to other creditors, including the asset that generated the company's income.   The unsecured creditor is the one who gets "squeezed" first and hardest if there is a problem.  
Other Assets - Advances on Properties
  1. Aabar has roughly AED7.8 billion in Advances on Investment Properties.  That's roughly 24% of assets.  There's no descriptive footnote to explain what these assets are and where they are.  I also note that the company depreciates buildings over 67 years (Note 3, page 20) on a straight line basis. 
  2. There are some "banking assets" in the consolidated financials related to Falcon.  But creditors and depositors at Falcon have first claim on these.  Probably to the tune of approximately AED4 billion (Due to Banks and Customer Deposits).
Cashflow
  1. You knew I'd get here eventually.
  2. On a cash operating basis Aabar was negative for both cashflow from operations and cashflow after working capital changes.  Considering the latter (AED1.1 billion)
  3. Investing Activities and Financing Activities were in a roughly balance at (AED21.4 billion) and AED22.2 billion. 
  4. Leading to an overall decline in cash of very roughly AED300 million.
Other
  1. The company has advised that its Board is recommending to the shareholders that they authorize the issuance of AED7.3 billion in convertible bonds  with a AED2.5 per share conversion price (roughly the current trading price).  The bonds would be issued to IPIC.  If the bonds are converted in full,  IPIC will own 85%.
  2. Since the bonds are not mandatorily convertible, they do not appear to be legally subordinate to other creditors.  Maybe some attorney out there who practices in the UAE can say if equitable subordination is a UAE-law concept.  (Editor's Note: The mere fact this question is posed here is perhaps a fairly clear sign of a bit of manifest delusion by the writer about the readership of this blog).
Summary - Trends to Watch
  1. Ability to diversify income.  Right now as described above the company is a one trick pony. Not something that realistically can be  changed overnight.  But something that should be worked on.
  2. Diversification in investments.  Beyond single name concentration (Daimler), the company is heavily skewed to the auto industry and has made some additional investments in this space  - though it has also diversified since then with an investment in Virgin "Space"! 
  3. What the additional AED7.3 billion in convertible bonds are used for.  Replacement of debt? Additional investments?    
  4. What is the investment philosophy of Aabar?  What sort of portfolio is it building?   Does the portfolio exhibit a common theme?  Or competence resident at the company (Aabar) level?  Is Aabar merely a financial investor?  Or somehow will it be involved in developing value?  Or is it just  buying "stuff" that looks good at the time?  And which might later be discovered to be "non core" assets? There doesn't appear to be a clear statement on investment strategy on Aabar's website.  The last analyst presentation posted on the site dates from 2007.
  5. How do Aabar's investments fit in with IPIC's mandate?  As per its website, "The International Petroleum Investment Company, IPIC, was formed by the Abu Dhabi government in 1984, tasked with an ambitious mandate to invest in hydrocarbons industries across the globe."  And how  might that affect its contribution of future cash to Aabar in the future?
  6. Use of secured debt.  Are the key cash generating liquid assets pledged to creditors?  What does that mean for investors and unsecured creditors?
  7. Cashflow, cashflow cashflow.  The life blood of companies.  "Man" does not live by capital appreciation alone.

Thursday, 14 January 2010

The Lights Are Off

انا لله وانا اليه راجعون

Good night, Teddy.  Rest well.

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

IMF Researchers Review Lobbying by US Financial Firms - Those with the Most to Spend Have the Least to Offer

Three IMF researchers claim those US financial firms who lobbied the hardest engaged in the least sound activities and had the lowest profitability.

Those who can compete in the market do.  Those who can't lobby for profits.

Study here.