 | ||||
| SAM's Consultant Logician Philip Francis Queeg |
The press has reported that someone who is in an excellent position to know has stated that a replacement CEO for Twitter would have to be "foolish".
I believe the exact words were "foolish enough to take the position" or some variant.
However, there was no reported assessment about the state of mind of the recent purchaser of Twitter who it would seem to me--and perhaps to you--would have a lot more at stake than a "hired hand".
Does logic, perhaps geometric logic, enable us to draw a reasonable conclusion?
As a side note, most successful businessmen and their bankers report that rigorous up front due diligence generally--but not always--leads to better decisions than that conducted after the closing.
Posts
