|
Prepare Yourself for One of AA's Rants |
You bet AA is mad and
frankly isn’t going to take it anymore, especially after another frustrating attempt to use the DFM website to do some background research on GFH.
One of the things that investors generally expect from stock exchanges is
information. Some exchanges make
information easy to find and obtain.
Some don’t.
Now if you were to ask the average Abullah or Trevor from
the street about the DFM and BB, the DFM would generally come out as the “better”
exchange.
This post will discuss three areas of shortcoming where the DFM
misses the standard of the BB using GFH to illustrate them.
First, easily accessing corporate disclosures.
Here are links to the corporate disclosure
pages at DFM
and BB
for GFH.
The first thing you’ll note
is that the BB link goes directly to the Corporate Actions page.
The DFM link goes to the overview page and
you have to select the disclosures tab at the top. Not a
big thing. Let’s mark this a minor
inconvenience.
More importantly, you’ll
note that the BB has a descriptive title for the majority of news items, Dividends Declared,
Market Making Report.
DFM contents
itself with the descriptor “Notification”.
Ah, tell me something I didn’t know. It’s a notification, right? But about what?
Notification is definitely not helpful and
leads to a waste of time if one is trying to research a particular topic or
wants to know what disclosures GFH or another issuer has made. Mark this a major inconvenience. One that really doesn’t need to be.
At the DFM, if you click on a particular
Notification, you get a second page with a button which tells you how many
documents there are on what is still a “secret” topic. Click on the button. You get another link to the still “secret”
document or documents. Click on the
document to retrieve it. Your patience
is finally rewarded because at this point when the document opens, the “secret”
is revealed. You now know what the “notification”
is about. But للصبر حدود Mark this a major time waster. Mark this as
highly user unfriendly.
At the BB,
you click on the title and get directed to a page with additional information
on the topic and then one further click to get the document. One less click. You need not go down the rabbit hole as at
the DFM to figure out if this is a notification you’re interested in or not.
Now suppose you want to go back to the
list of disclosures.
At the DFM, there is no back button. So if having solved one mystery, you’re up to
try your luck with a second Notification, you need to use the “page back”
button/arrow on your browser. Alas, you find yourself back to page 1 of the
list you’re looking at. If you’ve picked
a period with multiple pages, yes, you go back to page 1 even if you were on page
2, 3, or 4. Mark this down as
ridiculous. As well not particularly
user friendly.
At BB, there is a back
button. Surely the DFM can afford a back
button. Can’t it?
Click on it (BB’s back button) and you wind up
on the last page you were looking at.
Second, trading information.
The DFM apparently believes or knows that
its investors really only look back six months from the current date.
BB caters to an apparently different set
of investors who may wish to take longer looks up to 10 years. But note if you click a longer period, the
entire chart might not display in the window so you will have to scroll
horizontally. As well, BB allows
customization of its data charts. Want
candles? They got candles. Want bars? They
got bars. And not just for week-ending
Saudis! Want technicals? They got technicals.
Surely if BB can do this, DFM with much greater resources can at least do
the same. Why it apparently hasn’t, is
one of those Middle Eastern “mysteries”.
Third, disclosure standards.
The Central Bank of Bahrain has
mandated that an issuer listed in Bahrain or one that has offered a security
there must disclose in Bahrain any information required by another exchange
even if Bahrain doesn’t otherwise require that disclosure.
You won’t find the minutes of GFH’s March
2019 AGM and EGM at the DFM. You will
find them at the BB. All that’s at the DFM or all that I could find is a
summary of decisions taken. No insight
into debate or shareholder objections.
This information should be at the DFM.
Additionally,
the DFM or other regulatory authority should mandate a rule similar to the CBB’s. If you disclose elsewhere, you must disclose
on the DFM even if we don’t otherwise require it.
This year probably in
response to GFH’s excellent 2018 adventure (perhaps more accurately
misadventure) in treasury share trading, the CBB began requiring that each
month’s market making activity be disclosed.
GFH is disclosing this on both the BB and DFM.
The DFM should consider having a similar rule
because this is useful information and not every issuer on the DFM is subject
to CBB regulations.
Does all this mean that the DFM is not a good
exchange? No, what it means in standard
financial advice terms is that the “DFM needs to up its game”. Make its website more user friendly, provide
more information, and strengthen some aspects of its disclosure rules.