 |
| Spot the Link to Scotland |
A relatively large amount of ink – both real and electronic-- has been spilled of late over Standard Life Aberdeen’s adoption of a “new” trendy identity.
Just the step you’d probably expect “futurists” would take.
I have my own opinion on this sad affair.
When I think of the Scots, I picture thrifty, hard working, sensible people, who can have a bit of fun. “Laugh with the devil” and be as “gentle and prickly as our own downy thistle”.
“arbdn” doesn’t “fit” that impression.
Contrary minds might cite “Irn-Bru” to counter my ill-tempered judgement..
But that (the name not my judgement) arose for copyright and brand identity concerns. Sensible marketing..
Rather than piling on abrdn, I want to focus on the apparent pernicious effect of marketing in this matter. Because the name doesn’t seem to be accompanied by typical consultancy advice on strategy or structure.
But rather merely placing the old wine in new skins.
To set the stage a quote from a recent FT article on the topic.
But Manfred Abraham, joint chief executive of Yonder Consulting, said Abrdn was the first branding change in wealth management “befitting of the fintech revolution”.
He added: “Asset management brands are all very homogenous and traditional.
“Abrdn has the feel of a Monzo or Starling — and that opens the door to the inner workings of the company modernising too.”
And my reaction.
I’m not sure what abrdn or its new logo have to do with fintech.
It could just as well be a competitor to Airbnb. Or a new fast food restaurant. Perhaps the result of a corporate “coupling”.
Or perhaps signage in an airport or tube station. This way to the "abrdn".
There is a reason why why asset management firms have traditional names. To convey the impression that they are sensible careful people who you can trust with your money.
That being said, there is clearly a market for investments for those who like to take a punt on delusion. Hopefully, abrdn is not targeting this group.
As to other names …
When I hear the name “Monzo”, I think of “gonzo”. Or perhaps the nickname of a loan shark. Not a proper bank.
In the former North American colonies, starlings are about as well respected as their “cousins” pigeons -- “rats with wings”.
Whatever one’s view of this species, it’s hard to connect either bird with “fintech” or finance. Perhaps with bicycles?
That leads to the name of the company commenting on the change: “Yonder”.
A firm with this archaic name would not appear to be on the “bleeding edge” of the marketing “space”. One not inhabited by “tiger teams”.
It’s not a legacy name.
There is no eponymous founder, Anthony Charles Brakewell Yonder, OBE, the English David Ogilvy.
Yonder is of more recent vintage.
Formed in October 2020 out of four companies to “create a new consultancy proposition”. Whose truth value perhaps remains undetermined to this day. At least it’s not a conjecture.
After the apparent application of their unique skills and insights, they actually chose this name. It may come then as no surprise that “abrdn” also is melodious to their ears.
It is not a unique name. Not an Exxon or Exelon.
Rather you will find a variety of other “Yonder” companies across the globe. Or as we might say surveying the field “yonder lea, yonder lea”.
So much for brand identity.
Physician, heal thyself.
“YNDR”? Redyon? Ekeipera?
I don’t know how to react to the last comment about these names “opening the door to the inner workings of the company modernising too”.
Many of the great advances in business babble have come to us from the “science” of marketing and consultancy. As well I will admit valid insights, but perhaps less often.
Posts
