On a Winning Streak with Another Great Pick |
Consistency in performance is what distinguishes a great businessman or a great political leader from mediocre ones.
Here we are in part 3 of extreme vetting and the pattern is consistent. You be the judge of performance.
Here we are in part 3 of extreme vetting and the pattern is consistent. You be the judge of performance.
AA's head is spinning as promised by Candidate Trump.This week, the AP revealed Manafort's secret work for a Russian billionaire to advance the interests of Russian President Vladimir Putin a decade ago. Manafort did not dispute working for Oleg Deripaska but said he had represented him only in personal and business matters. He called the focus on him a "smear campaign," and said he was ready to defend his work if investigators wish to learn more about it.The White House said Trump had not been aware of Manafort's work on behalf of Deripaska, a close Putin ally with whom Manafort, who is 67, eventually signed a $10 million annual contract beginning in 2006. "The president was not aware of Paul's clients from the last decade," said spokesman Sean Spicer. "What else don't we know? I mean, where he went to school, what grades he got, who he played with in the sandbox?"
Does this mean that extreme vetting is extreme only in the past five years? Or is it a shorter period? And I suppose there's was no reason to ask Paul about his work in the electoral campaign of the pro-Russian candidate for President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych. Nor about the allegations raised by the current Kiev government against Mr.Manafort. A curious lack of curiosity.
Extreme Vetting 24/7
|
No comments:
Post a Comment