Another cold Dubai December and to top it off AA's Biggles' hat was at the cleaners. |
If you’re like AA, you might have been confused when you read
WAM’s 14
December 2016 (Arabic version
here) article or others in the media that the Central Bank of the UAE had
amended three paragraphs in Circular 24/2000.
Without any explanation or context provided, a reader might
conclude that the CB UAE has only recently moved to prohibit the opening of
numbered or anonymous accounts or require fairly standard CDD on
customers.
If you read the article in Gulf News yesterday, that's certainly the impression you'd get from the article's subtitle: "New rule strictly prohibits the opening of accounts with assumed names or numbers, among others".
If you read the article in Gulf News yesterday, that's certainly the impression you'd get from the article's subtitle: "New rule strictly prohibits the opening of accounts with assumed names or numbers, among others".
If true, this would represent a serious shortcoming in the
UAE’s AML/CFT efforts.
However, it’s not the case.
The 2000
Circular already contained such requirements. Article 4 in that Circular is quite unequivocal, e.g. "يمنع منعا باتا فتح حسابات ". The English version is similarly strict.
So what’s going on?
The three articles are being amended to permit reliance on
UAE national ID cards as proof of an individual's identity. The 2000 Circular
only permitted the use of passports.
Someone at WAM or CBUAE missed the bus by not including
this information.
AA did not.
Ever since the fateful day pictured above, AA has been doubly careful or at least tried to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment