Awal Bank files request for extension of time
Bahrain, 4 November 2010: Charles Russell LLP, acting as External Administrator and Foreign Representative (the “Foreign Representative”) of and for Awal Bank BSC (“Awal Bank”) has filed a request for an extension to the deadline to file schedules of assets and liabilities and statement of financial affairs (the “Schedules”) in the Chapter 11 Case commenced on 21 October 2010.
The request follows the first day hearing that took place on 26 October 2010 at which the Foreign Representative sought an order to establish a workable protocol to administer the Chapter 11 Case in cooperation and coordination with the Bahraini administration. After hearing from both the Office of the United States Trustee and counsel for the Foreign Representative, the Bankruptcy Court directed that the Motion be further considered at a later date in order to allow more time to assess the information provided and after giving opportunity for creditors to make representations regarding the relief requested in the Motion.
The Foreign Representative has determined that additional time is required to assess, among other things, creditor views in relation to the Chapter 11 Case. Upon this assessment being undertaken, the Foreign Representative will determine whether to further pursue the Chapter 11 Case. The Office of the United States Trustee has indicated it has no objection to the Foreign Representative’s request for additional time to file the Schedules.
In October 2009 the Foreign Representative obtained “foreign main proceeding” recognition from the Bankruptcy Court under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code for Awal Bank’s administration proceedings in Bahrain.
The Bahraini administration governed by the Central Bank of Bahrain and Financial Institutions Law (“CBBFIL”), continues to be recognised as the foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15. The U.S. based legal activities form part of a multinational litigation process, with court proceedings also currently underway in Bahrain, the Cayman Islands, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Please contact David J. Molton, Esq. from Brown Rudnick LLP, counsel to the Foreign Representative, at 00 1 212 2094822 with any inquiries.
Friday, 5 November 2010
Awal Bank Chapter 11 Filing Update - Request for Extension of Time to Provide Information
Here's an update from Bell Pottinger Middle East on the case. BPME is the PR company used by Charles Russell for the Awal Bank engagement.
Monday, 1 November 2010
Gulf Finance House - Draft Terms on New Sukuk = 23% Annual Return
Choose Your Door Carefully. Some Deals are Better than Others.
As you recall, GFH announced with great fanfare its plan to raise up to US$500 million in new capital. If you don't, here's an earlier post.
I've just gotten a copy of the draft term sheet for the Sukuk from a reliable source.
First, a recitation of the terms:
- Type - Convertible Murabaha Facility
- Status - Senior Unsecured Debt
- Maturity - 3.5 years
- Profit Payment (aka Interest Rate) - Indicative 12% per annum!
- Conversion Price - US$0.31 per share
- Incentive Structure - If conversion election made before 31 December 2010, last 2.5 years Profit Payment in shares at US$0.31 conversion price.
Before the commentary, two very important caveats:
- GFH's shareholders have not approved the issuance. GFH's first OGM and EGM failed for lack of a quorum.
- The terms sheet is marked "indicative" meaning it's not binding, but rather serves as a basis for discussion/negotiation with potential investors.
- Nonetheless, these terms provide a window into what GFH's board and management believe will be necessary to secure investor interest. In that regard, I'd note that the accompanying investor presentation (a future post will comment on that) states: "Some commitments already received from Chairman, strategic investors, and related parties". So you can be pretty sure that GFH has drawn on these disinterested parties to set market-based terms.
Now to the commentary.
- Assuming a take and hold investor who does not elect conversion until after 31 December 2010, the promised return (IRR basis) is roughly 23% per annum.
- 12% of that return composed of cash (the "interest payments"). It's hard to see GFH earning sufficient returns to have much left for shareholders after the interest payment is made.
- 11% of that from the discount on the shares (assuming the shareholders approve the 1:4 reverse split and GFH trades at 4 times its current US$0.125 per share. A rather substantial dilution of existing shareholders.
- The total promised return reflects the weak financial condition of the company when it has to offer essentially private equity like returns for its debt. Of course, the actual return will depend on GFH's performance which may indicate a market judgment on the probability of such performance.
- It also establishes what might be considered an "unfortunate" benchmark for GFH's debt issues. Particularly, when one considers this is apparently an early offer to potential investors. And as we all know the first price in the suq is not the last.
Gulf Finance House to Ask Sukuk Holders for Three Year Extension
Reuters is quoting an unnamed GFH spokesman that the Bank intends to ask the holders of its US$200 million Sukuk issue (US$137 million outstanding) to roll the Sukuk on its original terms for three years. That is, to extend the maturity from 2012 to 2015.
I'm not sure if "chuzpah" is an Islamic banking term, but it would sure seem to apply here. The Sukuk is currently trading at around just a whisker over 50% of face value.
I'd also note that earlier this week GFH formally stated that it had not issued the information the Gulf Daily News report that it intended to either (a) sell assets to US$90 million in debt next year or (b) reschedule debt. If you recall the original GDN article, there was a third alternative mentioned - which was extinguishing debt via asset transfers. Interestingly enough, what is mentioned in the GDN article is precisely what I see on page 13 in the copy of GFH's October 2010 "Return to Growth" Presentation to investors which I recently obtained.
It is, I suppose, indeed sad that someone is issuing presentations using GFH's highly respected name in such a fashion.
It is, I suppose, indeed sad that someone is issuing presentations using GFH's highly respected name in such a fashion.
As to pricing for GFH debt, please see my soon to be issued companion post on the draft terms for GFH's proposed new Sukuk.
National Bank of Kuwait – Related Parties’ Loans Analysis
One of our regulator and insightful commenters, Advocatus, said that there were rumors in the market that NBK was experiencing problems with its exposure to M Al Khorafi and had to extend the loans more than once to keep them from becoming classified as non performing.
An intriguing comment.
Abu Shukri is known as a careful banker, but even Homer nodded from time to time. And sometimes it is very hard to say "no" to a very well connected shareholder. As they say: "Past performance is not a guarantee of future results."
Without access to NBK's internal records, it's not possible to say one way or another. Let's look and see if we can find any signs of difficulties in NBK's financials.
Related Party Information
The first assumption is that loans to MAK or other AlKhorafi entities would be reported in the Related Parties Section. The data below is taken from the Related Party Notes in the Bank's Quarterly financials and is expressed in millions of KD.
Quarter | RP Loans | Collateral | % Cover |
1Q07 | 215.1 | 519.7 | 242% |
2Q07 | 262.2 | 608.4 | 232% |
3Q07 | 294.9 | 634.3 | 215% |
4Q07 | 307.3 | 672.6 | 219% |
1Q08 | 285.5 | 728.2 | 255% |
2Q08 | 295.2 | 742.0 | 251% |
3Q08 | 316.6 | 719.1 | 227% |
4Q08 | 350.6 | 494.4 | 141% |
1Q09 | 278.8 | 451.5 | 162% |
2Q09 | 310.4 | 544.9 | 176% |
3Q09 | 189.7 | 363.8 | 192% |
4Q09 | 219.3 | 343.8 | 157% |
1Q10 | 210.7 | 380.2 | 180% |
2Q10 | 186.5 | 350.7 | 188% |
3Q10 | 183.7 | 413.1 | 225% |
- Collateral coverage is reasonably comfortable, except for 4Q08. If there was a problem with Related Party loans, it's likely this is when it occurred. Two factors accounted for this change: a very dramatic decline in collateral and an increase in outstandings.
- The significant drop in collateral coverage in 4Q08 coincides with the dramatic decline in market values following the collapse of Lehman. This suggests that the collateral is composed of equities and other marketable securities.
- One would also expect that this would be a time of liquidity and cashflow stress leading borrowers to draw down additional amounts to cover their needs.
- However, there is remediation on the principal side in 1Q09 with a KD71.8 reduction (twice the increase in 4Q08). That's quite remarkable because this was not exactly a "boom" time for Kuwait or the world in general.
- Further declines in 2010 appear to indicate that there is no problem with RP loans. By 1Q10 these were below their 1Q07 level. Collateral coverage remains comfortable and the absolute of loans outstanding is below those in 1Q07.
- I'd guess that Zain shares make up a good portion of the collateral for MAK exposure. But that is just a guess. If so, the Itisalat acquisition should lead to a further dramatic reduction in RP loans.
Another place to look is for the IFRS #7 Note on renegotiated loans.
- Note 28.1.4 to NBK's 2009 financials state that only KD8.4 million of loans were renegotiated in that fiscal year and nil the year before. I didn't seem similar disclosure in the 2007 financials.
- If NBK were having problems with MAK exposure, one might expect to see larger "renegotiated" amounts, though it is possible in this sort of situation for a bank to extend a new loan to repay another short term loan and treat it as a new loan. One would expect that interest would have to be paid in full for the auditors to sign off. I'd note that one's expectations are not always fulfilled.
The financials don't disclose any problems, though as mentioned above this analysis is based on an external diagnosis without benefit of x-rays (details of NBK's exposure to the AlKhorafi Group).
Labels:
Financial Analysis,
Kuwait,
National Bank of Kuwait
Sunday, 31 October 2010
International Investment Group - KPMG Report to be Released
IIG announced in several venues today that its new board had approved the release of the KPMG report to certificateholders of its Sukuk.
"Unfortunately", AA missed this "wonderful" investment opportunity. What was I thinking? And, so, I won't be getting a copy.
Anyone who has a spare copy that they don't mind sharing please contact me via this blog's Contact Page.
Friday, 29 October 2010
Awal Bank Chapter 11 Filing - Statement on Behalf of Charles Russell
In response to my request I received the following from Alisdair Haythornthwaite at Bell Pottinger Middle East (UAE). BPME is a division of Chime Communications, a leading UK public relations firm (among other things).
Awal Bank BSC Chapter 11 Case Update
U.S. Court Delays Consideration of Awal Bank’s Proposed Chapter 11 Protocol
Bahrain, October 27, 2010: Charles Russell LLP, acting as External Administrator and Foreign Representative (the “Foreign Representative”) of and for Awal Bank BSC (“Awal Bank”) attended a “first day” hearing on October 26, 2010.
At the hearing, the Bankruptcy Court considered the Foreign Representative’s Motion for Entry of an Order Establishing Protocol for Chapter 11 (the “Motion”). After hearing from both the Office of the United States Trustee and counsel for the Foreign Representative, the Bankruptcy Court directed that the Motion be further considered at a later date after giving opportunity for creditors to make representations regarding the relief requested in the Motion.
The U.S. based legal activities form part of a multinational litigation process, with court proceedings also currently underway in Bahrain, the Cayman Islands, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. It is therefore necessary that any Protocol established in the U.S. works alongside the work being undertaken in Bahrain. In this regard the Foreign Representative is considering whether to further pursue the relief requested in the Motion.
In October 2009 the Foreign Representative obtained “foreign main proceeding” recognition from the Bankruptcy Court under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code for Awal Bank’s administration proceedings in Bahrain. The Bahraini administration governed by the Central Bank of Bahrain and Financial Institutions Law (“CBBFIL”), continues to be recognised as the foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15.
I'll keep monitoring the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York for electronic filings on the case to see if there is anything on the Court's reasoning for its decision.
Thursday, 28 October 2010
Damas - New AED 614 Million Agreement with Abdullah Brothers
Damas announced on Nasdaq Dubai that it had revised its agreement with the Abdullah Brothers regarding the amounts they owe to Damas.
One key item is the fixing of the price of the 1,840,250 grams of gold the Brothers stole from the Company at AED 256 million.
Presumably, this has been set so that Damas is not disadvantaged.
Setting the amount owed is a key step. Collecting it may prove a bit more difficult.
Awal Bank Chapter 11 Filing
There's a report in AlQabas Thursday edition that Judge Groper denied Awal Bank's Chapter 11 petition. At this point, there is nothing posted on the NY Southern District Bankruptcy Court website. The last document there is the notice of 26 October for the hearing to be held today (27 October).
Gulf Finance House 3Q10 Financials: A Train Wreck
Studio Lévy & fils 1895
When You Turn the Corner Make Sure the Track Goes There
When You Turn the Corner Make Sure the Track Goes There
Get out your magnifying glasses and join me in reading the full 3Q10 financials that GFH submitted to the Dubai Financial Market Wednesday morning. Since I've got my soapbox out for a later tirade, I might as well take this opportunity to suggest to the DFM that they invest a few dirhams in upgrading their electronic imaging system for faxes they receive. There really is no good reason in this day and age that the output cannot by A4 size.
Looking at the financials we see from Note 12, that GFH's US$115 million loss was primarily caused by provisions. Some US$101 million of them. But not provisions for investments. Rather US$60.5 million for an investment banking service receivable. And US$36 million from the sale of investments. I guess if one sells assets of "volatile" quality, one might expect some "volatility" in the receivables from the sales.
That being said, GFH has continued to maintain in its Other Assets the US$134 million "magical asset provision" and US$161.8 million in "Financing to Projects".
Another unfortunate trend is operating income which is running US$60.7 million negative for the first nine months of 2010 as compared to US$36.7 million for the comparable period the previous year. This is due to a collapse in revenues. On the cost side GFH has actually done quite nicely in bringing costs down. But, if one can't pay the light bills from operations, it's hard to see a bright future.
As a result of the net loss, GFH's CAR has slipped below the 12% minimum set by the CBB. In the financials, KPMG coyly states in Note 2:
If like me that's what you think, you're disappointed by KPMG's apparent lack of action on this point. They were silent on this topic. And they did not force GFH to disclose this information in a note to the financials. It's unclear if this is due to desire not to embarrass its client. Or slavish adherence to some accountant's taqlid as to the wording used for "emphasis of matter".
Looking at the financials we see from Note 12, that GFH's US$115 million loss was primarily caused by provisions. Some US$101 million of them. But not provisions for investments. Rather US$60.5 million for an investment banking service receivable. And US$36 million from the sale of investments. I guess if one sells assets of "volatile" quality, one might expect some "volatility" in the receivables from the sales.
That being said, GFH has continued to maintain in its Other Assets the US$134 million "magical asset provision" and US$161.8 million in "Financing to Projects".
Another unfortunate trend is operating income which is running US$60.7 million negative for the first nine months of 2010 as compared to US$36.7 million for the comparable period the previous year. This is due to a collapse in revenues. On the cost side GFH has actually done quite nicely in bringing costs down. But, if one can't pay the light bills from operations, it's hard to see a bright future.
As a result of the net loss, GFH's CAR has slipped below the 12% minimum set by the CBB. In the financials, KPMG coyly states in Note 2:
"Further, the capital adequacy ratio of the Group as at 30 September 2010 was below the minimum required by the regulatory ratio …"No quantification is given. We don't know if GFH just missed the ratio and has a CAR of 11.99%. Or, if it's CAR is 1.9%. You might think that the auditors would consider it important to quantify this shortfall. It certainly is a bit of "material" information that stakeholders would like to know. And more importantly should know.
If like me that's what you think, you're disappointed by KPMG's apparent lack of action on this point. They were silent on this topic. And they did not force GFH to disclose this information in a note to the financials. It's unclear if this is due to desire not to embarrass its client. Or slavish adherence to some accountant's taqlid as to the wording used for "emphasis of matter".
Note to Central Bank of Bahrain: It might be a good idea to specify in Module PD that when the CAR regulatory threshold is breached, the Licensee state the resulting ratio with details of the calculation. And if anyone from the CBB is reading this, I'd reiterate my earlier suggestion that Module PD be amended to require that Licensees report on the BSE the more detailed of (a) what Module PD requires and (b) what they are required to report on other exchanges. There is no reason that Bahraini investors should get second rate incomplete information which is available to investors in Dubai or elsewhere.
We don't have all the information required to calculate GFH's CAR at 30 September 2010. But we can make some estimates which should give a pretty good directional sense of the CAR.
The Table below summarizes these:
30-Jun-10 | Case A | Case B | |
Regulatory Capital | US$ 363,220 | US$ 248,220 | US$ 114,229 |
Total RWA | US$2,811,417 | US$2,683,417 | US$2,549,417 |
CAR | 12.92% | 9.25% | 4.48% |
Notes & Assumptions:
- 30 June 2010 CAR is as per GFH's Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosure.
- The key assumption is that there is no real significant change in Regulatory Capital or Total Risk Weighted Assets (Credit, Market and Operational Risk) except for the adjustments specified in the two "cases". These adjustments are made from the 30 June figures reflected above. This is a simplifying assumption so the ratios derived will not be exact but should be "close enough" to get a good sense.
- Case A: US$115,000 (the 3Q10 loss) is deducted from Regulatory Capital and US$128,000 is deducted from Total RWA at 100%.
- Case B: US$134,000 (the "magical asset" provision) is deducted from both Regulatory Capital and Total RWA. And again at 100%.
The results are to say the least not encouraging. It's hard to see how even the "Prettiest" words could convince even the "wisest" of investors to put equity into this firm.
The Gulf Daily News is reporting that they've seen a GFH "Investor Presentation" in which GFH states it intends to sell assets to raise cash to pay back some US$90 million in debt maturing next year or restructure that debt. In further discussions with GFH, the GDN was told that other options being considered were an IPO of some of its mega projects (North Africa and India) or perhaps giving creditors land, shares or other of GFH's highly valuable assets. There is a danger with the latter for creditors. As the choice assets are stripped from GFH's balance sheet, remaining creditors are left with lesser ones to settle their debts. The only option not mentioned here was putting a brick from one of these projects under EJ's pillow in the hopes that the Real Estate Jinn would put US$500 million under his pillow.
It's hard to imagine a "wise" creditor putting funds into GFH.
And it takes a bit of "optimism" to see a real future for GFH.
You can find more posts on GFH by using the Label "Gulf Finance House".
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
Gulf Finance House 3Q10 Financials: GFH Continues to "Turn Corner". But Unfortunately Into Oncoming Car
Not sure how GFH will spin this, but they've announced a loss of US$115.1 million for the 3Q10 making the loss for the first nine months of the year US$162.8 million. And, no, the optimistic US$134 million of reimbursement rights remains on the balance sheet. So this loss is due to other problems,. The reimbursement problem has yet to be acknowledged - which means of course that GFH is in a "world of trouble".
As a result, Shareholders' Equity is at US$303 million, well below the US$400 million TNW covenant. As well as breaching the Central Bank of Bahrain minimum CAR requirement.
More later when I have time.
Footnote for the Central Bank of Bahrain.
As usual, GFH has released the absolute minimum on the BSE, while releasing its entire 3Q financial on the DFM. It's unclear why Bahraini investors should be disadvantaged. Perhaps time to revise the regulation to require that if a firm is required to disclose more on another exchange, then it disclose the same on the BSE.
I will make no comment about the ethics of a firm that engages in such selective disclosure, particularly one that claims to follow the teachings of a noble religion.
Footnote for the Central Bank of Bahrain.
As usual, GFH has released the absolute minimum on the BSE, while releasing its entire 3Q financial on the DFM. It's unclear why Bahraini investors should be disadvantaged. Perhaps time to revise the regulation to require that if a firm is required to disclose more on another exchange, then it disclose the same on the BSE.
I will make no comment about the ethics of a firm that engages in such selective disclosure, particularly one that claims to follow the teachings of a noble religion.
Monday, 25 October 2010
Another Cut from Kawalis (Al Qabas)
Another gem from Kawalis.
- سئل مدير استقال من شركة استثمارية غير مدرجة عن ملايين دنانير طارت خلال عهده، فأجاب بأنها رشاوى دفعت لجهات حكومية!
That's funny I'm sure all my Gulf friends and those from the Levant and parts further West told me that Rashwa was a singer. Sort of like Nancy but more modestly dressed and without all her provactive gyrations. And so suitable for performances even for the self-proclaimed religious. "Discreet yet beautiful" was how one described her. I'm guessing Rashawi is the name of her new band. Perhaps like the Spice Girls. But definitely more modestly dressed as I said above.
Translation: "A manager who resigned from an unlisted investment company was asked about the millions of dinars which "flew away" during his tenure. He responded that they were bribes (rashawi plural of rashwa) paid to government departments."
Pretty clear to me that this isn't an item about Kuwait.
Labels:
Humor
Friday, 22 October 2010
New Addition to List of Interesting Blogs - Dubai Nights
Another addition to our list of interesting blogs. Dubai Nights.
Labels:
Blogs
More on Awal Bank Chapter 11 Filing
Updated for comments on Chapter 11.
Here are some additional details on Awal's filing.
- The case number assigned by the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Manhattan is 10-15518-alg. Awal's previous Chapter 15 filing has case number 09-15923alg.
- As indicated by the "alg" at the end of the case number, Justice Allan L. Gropper has been assigned this case.
- The Bank is being represented by Brown Rudnick LLP who filed the Voluntary Petition for Bankruptcy under Chapter 11.
- The filing was authorized by Awal's Administrator, Charles Russell, LLP. Presumably before proceeding CR obtained the no objection of the Central Bank of Bahrain who appointed them. I think this is a pretty strong indication that the CBB has decided to proceed with the liquidation of the Bank. Note: A Chapter 11 proceeding is of course a reorganization not a liquidation. The latter is Chapter 7. Chapter 11 allows the debtor to propose a plan for dealing with its existing obligations - either payment in full, in part, conversion to equity, etc. Post implementation the debtor continues as a going entity (e.g., Continental Airlines). So what I mean here is that the CBB has decided to proceed knowing it will cause the lenders some pain. That in turn means the situation is beyond repair. And that the Bahraini authorities have decided to "bite the bullet" and take the reputational damage that will come from such action.
As part of its filing, Awal Bank made the following statements:
- After the payment of various expenses including that of administration, there will be no funds available for distribution to unsecured creditors.
- Estimated creditors are between 50 and 99.
- US assets are above US$50 million up to and including US$100 million.
- Estimated debts (worldwide) are over US $1 billion. (This is the largest amount provided on the Bankruptcy Filing Form).
As required on the Filing Form, the debtor lists its top twenty unsecured creditors. No amounts are provided though.
Here they are in the order of appearance on the Form:
- Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, Abu Dhabi
- Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank, Abu Dhabi
- AlGosaibi Money Exchange, Saudi Arabia
- Bank of Montreal, Canada
- Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank, United Kingdom (London Branch)
- Bayerische Landesbank/Bayern LB Germany
- Boubyan Bank, Kuwait
- Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, United Kingdom
- Commercial Bank of Kuwait, Kuwait
- Commercial Bank of Qatar, Qatar
- Commerzbank Global Equities AG (formerly Dresdner Bank) Germany
- Commonwealth Bank of Australia, United Kingdom (London Branch)
- Fortis Bank, Belgium
- Gulf International Bank, Bahrain
- HSBC, Australia
- HSBC, United States (NY Branch)
- HSH Nordbank AG, German
- JP Morgan, United Kingdom (London Branch)
- Kuwait Finance House (Liquidity Management House), Kuwait
- The International Banking Corporation, Bahrain
If you're wondering about TIBC (which also filed under Chapter 15 in 2009) taking a similar action, a court hearing is scheduled under their case next week Tuesday (26 October). Stay tuned.
Awal Bank FIles for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in US
In terms of recovery all venues are likely to be highly inconvenient.
Update: See subsequent post.
According to news reports on Bloomberg, on 21 October Awal Bank filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District Court of Manhattan listing assets of between US$50 million to US$100 million and liabilities of more than US$1 billion.
That would not seem to augur well for creditors. Though it should come as no surprise.
Earlier Awal had filed under Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code. That Chapter is used when a company asserts its proceedings are taking place under a foreign jurisdictions laws and procedures broadly equivalent (in fairness) to US procedures. It will be interesting to see what arguments were advanced for moving the proceedings to the USA. Forum non conveniens?
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
Global Investment House Pays Another US$72.5 Million on its Restructured Debt
Global announced that value 21 October 2010 it had paid down another US$72.5 million of principal on its restructured debt.
With that payment it will have paid down 8.8% of its total debt. It has nine quarters to pay the rest. A journey of one thousand miles begins with a single step.
Global Investment House - Better Times Coming. Capital Increase in 2011?
Au or FeS2?
Also from the Reuters Middle East Investment Summit, Ms. Maha Al Ghunaim noted that:
- Global's performance for 2H10 will be better than 1H10. (Global lost KD34.4 million in 1H10 compared to KD98.6 in 1H09.
- The Company continues to monitor its costs and further reductions are in store.
- It expects to begin discussions with unnamed strategic investors in 1Q11 to discuss a capital raising.
Labels:
Global Investment House Kuwait,
Kuwait
Gulf Bank Kuwait - On the Mend. No More Loans to Saudis.
A banker's memory is a wonderful thing.
Even the most painful experiences can be forgotten.
Even the most painful experiences can be forgotten.
Michel Accad gave an interview at the Reuters Middle East Investment Summit in which he made the following points:
- 3Q10 is the turning point in GB's two year strategy to rebuild.
- Each subsequent quarter will be a relative improvement over the previous.
- By 3Q11 the rebuilding will be done (apparently one quarter ahead of time) and the bank will move to strengthen its income generation or its geographic coverage.
- The goal is to increase local market share from today's 12% to some 16% in five years.
- After 3Q10, the Bank will not need to provision as much but will continue to do so for precautionary reasons (rather than need).
- The Bank has decided not to make any loans to Saudi clients for at least 3 years. No doubt a reaction to its troubles with AlGosaibi and Saad Groups.
- Instead it will, however, make loans to foreign investors for their projects in Kuwait. And no doubt concentrate on its high quality Kuwaiti clients.
- As of 3Q10, the Bank has successfully reduced its non performing loans below 20% of the total portfolio. That's a lot of "Saudi" clients, it appears.
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
International Investment Group - Update from Delegate on IIG Funding Sukuk (Hint: No Good News)
Deutsche Bank as the Delegate on the above transaction issued an announcement on Nasdaq Dubai advising that:
- IIG had advised that it was awaiting ministerial approval of its new board so that they could vote to release the KPMG study to certificateholders who had signed a confidentiality agreement.
- The Paying Agent advised it had not received the funds for the 12 October payment.
- Certificateholders reminder of Dissolution Events and that they need to vote to accelerate.
- That IIG has not honored the claim served under the Purchase Undertaking.
- That the Delegate is not obliged to take actions unless indemnified to its satisfaction. Apparently, it has not been.
National Bank of Umm Al Qaiwain 3Q10 Financials - Update on Global US$250 Million Deposit Dispute
NBUQ released its 3Q10 financials earlier today. (Yes, I'm still stubbornly using that abbreviation even though their stock symbol is NBQ But I will alternate today between the two to partially satisfy those who have "complained".)
The major focus is as usual on the dispute over the US$250 million "deposit" (if you're Global Investment House) or the "prepayment" (if you're NBUQ). As you'll recall the dispute turns over whether an MOU between the two parties was a binding contract obliging GIH to buy securities convertible into NBQ equity. Yet another example of poor transaction structuring and legal documentation involving this instrument - which has been a rather costly mistake for purchasers in the past.
You can find more on this topic by using the labels "Convertible Bonds" and "National Bank of Umm Al Qaiwain".
The relevant notes in their financials are Other Assets (Note 13) and Other Liabilities (Note 17).
As per Note 17, NBQ is holding the funds in a non interest bearing account in the amount of AED918.25 million (equal to US$250 million at the FX rate as of 30 September). But as you'll see from Note 13, it has deposited AED1,034 million with the First Instance Court of Dubai pursuant to an order from that Court.
The difference (just under AED 116 million) is presumably interest and perhaps legal costs for Global. The amount represents a little over one quarter's net income for NBUQ.
The Appeals Court is scheduled to hear NBQ's appeal on 8 November 2010. The 29 September session adjourned without taking a decision and was designed to let NBQ object to both the decision in Global's favor and the interest payment.
You'll also note that in Other Assets, NBQ is showing some AED82.7 million in "split deals". Shades of Mashreqbank and its deals with Awal Bank and with TIBC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)